Tag Archive | M Linden

Farewell to M, a welcome back to Philip and some thoughts

M Linden turns into a devil by Daniel VoyagerAs possibly you know M Linden (Mark Kingdon) is going to step down as Linden Lab CEO and Philip Linden (Philip Rosedale) is back as interim CEO.

I was not a big fan of Mr. Kingdon, i think his view was not as passionate as Philip one, maybe was more about marketing than about community, and even i’m sure he tried his best to make Second Life a better place (or maybe only a better business) he had some… let’s say wrong (or “non popular”) choices or issues: SL Enterprise, the ban of freebies in XStreetSL, Zindra, Avatars United…

Anyway, i think those were not “bad” decisions themselves, but all of them together made a lot of residents be against him and his management. Of course there is also Viewer 2.0, but i’ll talk about it later. It seems sometimes we like to make M look as the Devil, but i’d like now to make some positive comments about M’s management:

In the time Mr. Kingdon was CEO of Linden Lab i think performance and stability has been better and better. Of course that means generally and sometimes is understandable a system so complex as the Second Life Grid has some problems.

Viewer 2.0 is a good product, works pretty good, has less problems with memory use that Emerald or any 1.23 based viewer and has some really cool features. And even you don’t like the UI (i like it personally even it can/should be improved) you can always use alternative viewers based in 1.23 UI.

I’m saying all this from my experience and point of view and is possible someone doesn’t agree, specially about Viewer 2.0, but i think is a question of preferences and nobody HAS TO use it, is an optional viewer.

And i needed to say all this because i’m tired of negativity, of “Second Life is crap”, of all this shit. Is difficult to find positive comments sometimes about Second Life, specially from the residents. Some of the SL residents seem to be incredibly reluctant to any minor change and they will complain about anything in any case (I still remember people complaining about Windlight), and to those who always complain i ask… if Second Life is so crappy and they have nothing positive to say about it why are they still in it? Why are they just complaining and complaining and they just can’t make or say something constructive? What are they doing to make Second Life better?

Criticism is good, it is even needed, but not empty one. Some people who doesn’t like the viewer is creating cool viewers with different features, that’s constructive criticism! Of course most of us can’t create a new viewer, but we can point what we don’t like, suggest how we think it would me and keep loving what we deeply love in this virtual world, say i like this and i dislike that.

As always i don’t pretend to tell people how they should act or react, i just express what i think, so feel free to comment and share also your point of view… and about Philip… welcome back home, Phil!

Image by Daniel Voyager published under a Creative Commons license.

Ramblings about SL6B and the vision on Linden Lab team

Philip Linden AKA "DA MAN" @ SL6B Opening Ceremony - Raul Crimson

Today was the opening of SL6B (Second Life 6th Birthday) celebration with a speech of Philip Linden, the founder and creator of what Second Life is (well, actually himself and his team). The picture above was taken during that speech. Just after the speech i started to think about how residents see Linden Lab and its events, specially when a friend said to me:

Wishing i was that enthusiastic about a Linden event.

In the last couple of years Linden Lab had a “tense” relationship with the residents, specially about one issue: the maturity of content and the grid, there was also quite a bit tension about the land prices but that was occasional. Nipples, child avatars, etc… all those were quite a conflict in some Linden events, at least in Burning Life and SL5B. At the same time, in this period, it seems Lindens are away from the residents and possibly this can be one of the reasons of this conflicts. Of course there are other reasons, like the pressure of some media and politics and the image of Linden Lab as business, possibly they don’t want to look like a sexual service, or a place where perverts have their games. Of course i understand their position is not easy, between the residents and the media + politics, but in the past i think they didn’t do thinks as good as they would.

Futurist Stage @ SL6B - Raul CrimsonAfter some time i presume i feel “in peace” lately with Linden Lab although all those mistakes, or at least after all those actions i think were not right. And i feel this peace because i think they are doing it better, or a few better. I think is a good idea to promote SL as an education tool, i think is a good idea to give the Linden Prize to organizations like Virtual Ability (with a program of help to real handicapped people in SL), i even think is not a bad idea to concentrate all the “sex industry” of Second Life in an special continent. At the same time, with this last action about “Adult” content the limits are clear and are not particularly “narrow” for what i saw and read. One can agree or not, but at least the statements are quite clear, or at least clearer. After this times feeling a bit upset with Linden Lab as resident and as customer it feels weird to talk good about them. :-D

Of course this would never be “the last word”, Linden Lab can do it better… or worse. Anyway, while i was at Philip’s speech, i was wondering where M was. Well, i don’t like M much, you know it, actually i think things were quite worse after he started being CEO. I don’t know if the last actions i talked about are part of his strategy, but someway i see him as an administrator more than as a “president”. M doesn’t has the charisma Philip has, M is more “grey”, more like an office man in a dark suit and white shirt. So i wonder if M was not there because this lack of charisma, because he was on holidays or because things will change again at Linden Lab soon. Well, i presume we will know sooner or later.

Customers or citizens of a benevolent dictatorship?

Sometimes, in the past, i protested for some comments of Philip Linden, the founder of Second Life. Most of the times i though he was having a wrong idea about the community of residents. Anyway, although all that M Linden is making me miss Philip badly. And we are having M for the last six month, so maybe is time to analize his work.

M said in an interview by Dusan Writer some days ago:

80% of our business is focused on the consumer market — which of course includes content creators. We are putting more than 80% of our investment in the consumer market because a good part of our investment in Enterprise crosses over (shared media). We talk about Enterprise because we are doing new things there. We need to talk more about our plans for consumer because we have many big projects under way there.

Ok, is only me? I don’t see where this 80% is going, and i don’t think it is for LDPW and the roads. Either seem to be for software development, because performance is getting worse in the last months although the “lower” impact of Openspaces now that almost 2000 sims disappeared in the last month.

We still don’t know how many islands will be lost until July next month, when the process of changes on Islands products will change. I just know we are having less “land” to explore and enjoy… and more residents (users hours and residents inworld are peeking), and that produces more problems with servers, so the “excuse” of poor performance to change the Openspace product is just going against Second Life itself.

As you may know Reuters left Second Life recently, Eric Krangel (Eric Reuters inworld) wrote a really interesting article talking about his vision of Second Life and why they left. I think you should read it because his opinion is pointy.

Personally i think all that is due the bad work of Linden Lab, Public Relations must be on holidays, Software development to be too it seems, so we just have M saying in an interview basically “All is good, all is ok.”.

Linden Lab acts like if the residents were citizens of a benevolent dictatorship, where M is the “Emperor” and the Lindens, the government. A dictatorship where they do “the best for the nation and its people” under their point of view ignoring the citizens. But they seem to be forgetting we are not citizens, we are customers! They seem to forget Linden Lab derives its revenue from user fees, not compulsory taxes. They seem to forget Second Life is NOTHING without the residents and their creativity but empty virtual land, where teaching virtual classes or making business presentations, of course.

I’d like to quote here, to end this post, something Vint Falken wrote in a blogpost, something that explains also my feelings with Linden Lab in the last times:

Excuse me my bitterness. But I still feel betrayed: a 2 year relationship, that you _know_ is dying. You still wish to fix everything, mainly because of the effort you put into it, because of you’re used to it and because of the mutual friends you now have, not because the butterflies are still there. You keep trying, attempt to be bedazzled again, but the other party just f*cks it up, each time. Eerrr… overreacting, me? :-D

If the resident had the power to vote for Linden Lab CEO, be sure i would never vote for M.

UPDATE (Dec. 02 2008): Just after posting this M published a post in the Official Linden Blog in the same line “We are better than ever and nothing is happening”.

The solution to Openspace sims question, or something like that…

Finally it seems Linden Lab reacted to all the protest of Residents about the Openspace sims price hike. M Linden wrote a post in the Official Linden Blog explaining what is the solution they found.

As you may know, some days ago Jack Linden posted about a plan to increase on a 65% rate the tier on Openspace sims due the “overuse of resources” by the residents and owners of that kind of sims. The protest started, in so many and imaginative ways, from strikes and protests at the Concierge Office inworld to groups on Flickr. Residents were angry and very creative, making even videos like this one by Kyotta Spitteler:

Finally, Linden Lab reacted changing the plans. A part of the blogpost of M there is some more information about the changes in the Knowledge Base. Basically they are changing the kinds of Private Islands:

  • Full Regions: The typical big ones, 15000 prims, 100 agents, same price (for the moment).
  • Homesteads: The actual Openspace sims, 3750 prims, 20 agents, will increase the fee from 75 US$ to 95 US$ in January and to 125 US$ in July.
  • Openspaces: The new kind with the same price, 750 prims, 10 agents, fee of 75 US$.

I think is a good solution, goes directly to the performance issue and gives options to the sim owners. But, Linden Lab shown us a really bad PR work with this issue, as i said in another post, Katt Linden possibly was on holidays or working in other stuff. Anyway, do you think is a good solution?

I just hope this issue to push Linden Lab to improve the ways of communication with the Residents.

UPDATE 06NOV08:

Reading this post again i think i was not clear enough about my point of view. I think this is a “better” solution than the original one, but is not the best one. The performance problem of the Openspaces was due bad settings made by Linden Lab themselves and now they are making Residents pay their mistake, with money or with hard use limitations.

Anyway, about this issue we all have different point of view, take a look at Vint Falken’s blog, she expresses there her point of view and has some interesting links.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 290 other followers